This week with Kate & Gina: Why support a stalker?

This is the first in a weekly installment on the comings and doings of that humorless team of Mrs. Grundy and the New Age Church Lady... our own Kate Matteson and Gina Trish. 

Now Kate & Gina are still sore that they lost the last election.  So sore that they haven't shut up about.  Even after those fool Democrats gave Kate the consolation prize of being executive director of the Sussex Democrat Committee, she still whined.  Never mind that she didn't care enough to vote most years.  

Kate & Gina's latest attack is on county Republicans for their support of conservative Republican Steve Lonegan for Congress.  Kate & Gina hate a guy like Lonegan because he believes in traditional -- as opposed to Wiccan -- values.  And he supports the Bill of Rights and the Second Amendment (which Kate & Gina said they did too -- when they were running in 2017 --but have since flip-flopped). 

Apparently Kate & Gina want to repeal the Second Amendment and, if you read what they believe are grounds for barring someone from elective office, the First Amendment as well.  Talk about making a fashion statement!

In their latest hypocrisy, Kate & Gina questioned the "unethical situations" of a certain Republican candidate -- forgetting that they have supported some pretty scurrilous people through their silence and willing accommodation.  Remember this guy...

Kate & Gina want to serve with Raj Mukherji.  They want to join the Democrat Assembly Caucus and support his work.  Why?  Because Kate & Gina put party loyalty before human decency. 

Kate & Gina have accused the Sussex GOP of having "no standard for the candidates they back" -- but what does it say for their "standards" when they refuse to call out a guy like Raj Mukherji?  Whatever you do, don’t call them feminists.

Should Democrat legislator resign over conviction?

We've been waiting for the campaign of U.S. Senate candidate Bob Hugin to step up and fire back at the group of hypocritical Democrats who accuse him of "racism" because he sought the endorsement of a conservative Assemblyman who attended a Hank Williams Jr. concert and who was photographed standing near a Hank Williams Jr. band banner (which consists of Hank Williams Jr.'s face, some lyrics to a Hank Williams Jr. song, and the rebel flag).  The worst this Assemblyman could be accused of is poor taste.  Racism is a lot deeper than that. 

Of course, one would have to be a person of more than Twitter depth to actually understand that racism isn't about one's fashion accessories.  And as this is the Democrat Caucus of the New Jersey Legislature, you are not going to get much in the way of deep thinking.  This caucus has already done so much to infantilize political discourse.  

Instead of remaining silent, Hugin's camp could have reminded these Assembly Democrats that they have in their caucus, at least one member who has faced criminal charges and who has been convicted of a federal crime.   And maybe they should do something about it, before going after someone who has questionable taste, but who hasn't broken any laws.  Oh, but wait, the hypocrites will say... he has a Dukes of Hazard tattoo!

What a bunch of handjobs... they probably watched the show themselves (and perhaps salivated a little over the bodacious Daisy Duke). 

The Assembly Democrats need to clean up their own caucus, starting with this guy...